# |
Map Code |
Demographic |
Legend Title |
Description |
Legend Type |
|
1 |
DST or DGT |
Median Household Income 2000 |
Median Household Income in Dollars by Census Tract |
Median Household Income in 2000 Dollars |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
DSC or DGC |
Poverty Population 2000 |
Number of Persons in Poverty by County |
100% Poverty Population for the year 2000. |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
DSC or DGC |
Percent Change in Poverty Population 1990-2000 |
Percent Change in Poverty Population by County |
Percent Change in 100% Poverty Population from 1990 to 2000 by County |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
DSC or DGC |
Percent of Persons in Poverty |
Percent of Total Population in Poverty by County |
Percent of County Population that is in Poverty |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
DST or DGT |
Density of 125% Poverty Population 2000 |
Number of 125% Poverty Population per Square Mile by Census Tract |
Density of 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Tract |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
DST or DGT |
125% Poverty Population 2000 |
Distribution of '125% Poverty Population by Census Tract |
Dot Density Map - 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Tract |
Dot Density |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
DST or DGT |
Change in 125% Poverty Population 1990-2000 |
Change in 125% Poverty Population by County/Tract |
Change in 125% Poverty Population 1990-2000 by County/Tract |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed Cases |
|
|
|
|
8 |
CSP |
Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 |
Closed Cases by Location |
Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Location |
Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
CGT |
Density of Closed Cases |
Number of Closed Cases per Square Mile by Census Tract; |
Density of Closed Cases 2003 by Tract |
Choropleth Determined/ Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
CGT |
Change in Closed Cases 2003 Compared to 2002 |
Change in Closed Cases by Census Tract |
Change in Closed Cases 2003 Compared to 2002 by Tract |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
SGT |
Distribution of Total Activity or Matters 2002 (CSR Cases/Non CSR//Matters - See Cal-LASOC) |
Activity by Location |
Distribution of Services 2003 by Location |
Dot Map/Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
CGP |
Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 Legal Category - Family or Housing or DMV or health…. |
Closed Cases by Location |
Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Location |
Dot Map/Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
CGP |
Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Service Provided - Brief Service & Counsel and Advice |
Closed Cases by Location |
Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Location |
Dot Map/Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
CGZ |
Percentage of Cases Closed with Extended Service - 2003 |
Percentage of Cases Closed with Extended Service - 2003 by ZIP Code |
Percentage of Cases Closed with Extended Service - 2003 by ZIP Code |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
CGP |
Distribution of Funding source (OAA, VAWA, Many) Closed Cases 2003 |
Closed Cases by Location |
Distribution of Closed Cases 2003 by Location |
Dot Map/Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overlay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access |
|
|
|
|
16 |
AGP |
Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 |
Closed Cases by Location, Number of 125% Poverty Population per Square Mile by Census Tract |
Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 - by Tract; Closed Cases by Location |
Choropleth Determined/ Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ASR |
Ratio of Closed Cases 2002 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 |
Ratio of Closed Cases per 125% Poverty Population by Service Area |
Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Regional Office |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
AGC |
Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 |
Ratio of Closed Cases per 125% Poverty Population by County |
Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 by County |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
AGT |
Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 |
Ratio of Closed Cases per 125% Poverty Population by Census Tract, Closed Cases by Location |
Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Tract |
Choropleth Determined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
SGP |
Cases Closed - Actual vs Predicted 2003 |
Standard Deviations Above or Below Predicted by Census Tract - OIG processed data |
Using poverty distribution at 125 % as predictor of number of cases closed show the calculated variation from the mean (shows relative underserved) |
Special Choropleth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
ALP |
Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 - (Zoom -ins) |
Closed Cases by Location, Number of 125% Poverty Population per Square Mile by Census Block Group |
Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 by Block Group; Closed Cases by Location |
Choropleth Determined/ Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
ALG |
Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 - Yellowstone County/Billings (Zoom-ins) |
Ratio of Closed Cases per 125% Poverty Population by Census Block Group, Closed Cases by Location |
Ratio of Closed Cases 2003 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 - by Block Group; Point Locations by Brief Service, Extended Service |
Choropleth Determined/ Point Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special |
|
|
|
|
23 |
CGZ |
Distribution of Private Attorneys 2004 (see Cal, Montana uses PAI Closed Cases 2003) |
Closed Cases by Location and Number of Attorneys by Zip Code |
PAI cased overlay over attorney by Zip Choropleth |
Dot Map/Point Location over Special Colorpleth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
AGT |
Distribution of Hotline Closed Cases 2002 to 125% Poverty Population 2000 |
Closed Cases by Location; Number of Persons per Square Mile by Census Tract |
Hotline Closed Cases over density of poverty population (125%) |
Dot Map/Point Location over Colorpleth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
DGT |
Non-English Speaking Persons 2000 |
Number of Persons by Census Tract |
Distribution (Dots) of Households where the Primary Language spoken in the home is not English by Census Tract. |
Dot density map with a different color dot for each language |
|
26 |
AGT |
Distribution of Target Population Closed Cases 2002 to Target Population 100% Poverty Population 2000 (Hispanic, Black, White, Asian, Seniors, Female Head of Households) |
Closed Cases by Location; Number of Persons per Square Mile by Census Tract |
Number of Target Persons in poverty per Square Mile by Census Tract with dots of Target Closed Cases |
Density - Choropleth (Target pov pop) with point overlay of cases |
|